FPA-PMLA-1842/CHN/2017 of D. Senthil v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Case brief
What is this about?
D. Senthil V/s The Deputy Director…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3609/CHN/2017 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1839/CHN/2017 J. Arul … Appellant/Applicant MP-PMLA-3611/CHN/2017 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1840/CHN/2017 S. Nirmala … Appellant/Applicant MP-PMLA-3613/CHN/2017 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1841/CHN/2017 Smt. S. Kumari … Appellant/Applicant MP-PMLA-3615/CHN/2017 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1842/CHN/2017 D. Senthil … Appellant/Applicant
Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : None. For the respondent : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 21.03.2018
FPA-PMLA-1839-1842/CHN/2017
Reply has been filed by the respondent. The learned counsel for the
appellant seeks time to file the rejoinder. Let the same be done within four weeks. Both the parties are allowed to file the written synopsis.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
MP-PMLA-3609/CHN/2017 & FPA-PMLA-1839/2017 through S. Nirmala, Smt. S. Kumari and D. Senthil
- respondent
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · March
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-1842/CHN/2017
- Topic
- Money Laundering
All orders in this case
13 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court