The Tribunal disposed of an appeal regarding a PMLA matter after finding the appellant bank had reconciled the loan amount.
No cost ordered; appeal disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3607/JP/2017 (Stay)
&
FPA-PMLA-1837/JP/2017
IDBI Bank Ltd. … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Mr. Sumit Nagpal, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Neeraj Atri, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 27.11.2018
FPA-PMLA-1837/JP/2017
Counsel for the appellant submits that the entire loan amount has been received by the appellant as the same has been reconciled. In view of the above, the appeal is disposed of.
No cost.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 27th November, 2018
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1837/JP/2017
Page 1 of 1
IDBI Bank Ltd.
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
