In FPA-PMLA-1828/DLI/2017, the Appellate Tribunal listed the appeal for further hearing on 31.10.2018, noting the absence of the appellant and allowing time for written submissions before granting a final order or disposition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1828/DLI/2017 Shalini Srivastava … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant : Shri Dipak Seth, Advocate Shri Ratnesh Chandra, Advocate |
|---|
| For the Respondent : Shri Atul Tripathi, counsel for ED |
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN |
| ORDER 05.07.2018 |
FPA-PMLA-1828/DLI/2017
Rejoinder has not been filed. No one appears on behalf of the appellant. Both the parties are allowed to file the written submission by the next date of hearing. List on 31.10.2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh)
Chairman
New Delhi, 05th July, 2018
‘SKB’
FPA-PMLA-1828/DLI/2017
Page 1 of 1
Shalini Srivastava
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
