Order in FPA-PMLA-1772/MUM/2017 listing the matter for argument after Senior Counsel submitted a procedural point regarding High Court proceedings and seeking record from the Adjudicating Authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3464/MUM/2017 (E.H.) MP-PMLA-3465/MUM/2017 (STAY)
&
FPA-PMLA-1772/MUM/2017
Ms. Kiran Mazumdar Shaw … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate Shri Arshdeep Singh, Advocate Ms. Meena Venugopal, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER 22.01.2018
FPA-PMLA-1772/MUM/2017
This order is passed in continuation with the order dated 11th April, 2017. Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that while filing the reply before the High Court of Karnataka, the stand is taken by the respondent that the said relief cannot be granted by the said High Court in view of the proceedings are pending before this Tribunal. Under these circumstances list this matter for argument.
Page 1 of 2
FPA-PMLA-1772/MUM/2017
List on 17th April, 2018.
The record from the office of Adjudicating Authority is called for the next date. The copy of the order be sent to the Adjudicating Authority for compliances.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore)
Member
New Delhi, 22nd January, 2018
‘K’
Page 2 of 2
FPA-PMLA-1772/MUM/2017
Kiran Mazumdar Shaw
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
