Single-paginated listing order in two PMLA proceedings (stay and FPA). No reply filed by respondent. Extended time to respond within four weeks; interim order continues. Hearing listed for July 2018.
Extended time to respondent to file reply within four weeks; interim order continued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3408/DLI/2017 (Stay)
&
FPA-PMLA-1757/DLI/2017
Shri Sant Lal Agarwal … Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Shailendra Bhardwaj, Advocate, Shri Inayat Ahmed, Advocate & Ms. Rehana Ahmed, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 15.02.2018
FPA-PMLA-1757/DLI/2017
Reply has not been filed. Mr. Nitesh Rana, learned counsel for the respondent seeks some more time. Let the same be done within four weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder four weeks thereafter.
List on 19th July, 2018.
Interim order to continue.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 15th February, 2018 ‘A’ FPA-PMLA-1757/DLI/2017
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant additional time to the respondent to file a reply and whether to extend the continuation of interim order.
Whether notice of hearing is required given the non-filing of reply by the respondent.
Shri Sant Lal Agarwal
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
