Order fixing time for filing rejoinder in connected PMLA appeals and listing the appeal for further hearing on 02.08.2018. No substantive decision recorded.
Four weeks allowed to file rejoinder. Appeal listed for hearing on 02.08.2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3379/BNG/2017 (Stay) &
FPA-PMLA-1746/BNG/2017
K.S. Nandini … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Dr. Rakesh Gosain, Advocate For the respondent : Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 21.02.2018
FPA-PMLA-1746/BNG/2017
Reply has been filed by the respondent. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent submits that the same reply may be read in the connected appeal. Learned counsel for the appellant seeking sometime
to file the rejoinder. let the same be done within four weeks.
List this appeal on 02nd August, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 21st February, 2018 ‘A’
FPA-PMLA-1746/BNG/2017
Page 1 of 1
K.S. Nandini
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
