The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appellants time to file a rejoinder and vakalatnama. The written synopsis was also permitted for filing and the matter was listed for a future date.
Time granted to the appellant to file rejoinder and vakalatnama within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1435/JP/2016 Surendra Kumar Sharma … Appellants FPA-PMLA-1436/JP/2016 Aruna Sharma & Anr. … Appellants FPA-PMLA-1693/JP/2016 Surendra Kumar Sharma … Appellants Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur … Respondents
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Mr. S.A. Saud, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 25.04.2018
FPA-PMLA-1435-1436 & 1693/JP/2016
Rejoinder has not been filed. Mr. S.A. Saud, Advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant seeks time to file the rejoinder as well as vakalatnama. Let the same be filed within four weeks. Parties are also allowed to file the written synopsis.
List on 13th September, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 25th April, 2018.
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1435-1436 & 1693/JP/2016
Page 1 of 1
Surendra Kumar Sharma & Anr.
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
