This appeal was listed for disposal. The respondent failed to file a reply. The appellate tribunal granted the appellant a final opportunity to file the reply within four weeks for a rejoinder to follow.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3192/MUM/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1664/MUM/2016
M/s Armstrong Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Karan K. Vyas, Advocate For the respondent : Shri A.K. Tripathi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 09.05.2018
FPA-PMLA-1664/MUM/2016
Reply has not been filed by the respondent. The counsel seeks one more opportunity to file the reply. Let the same be filed within four weeks as last opportunity to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder by the next date.
List on 23rd August, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 9th May, 2018
‘d’
FPA-PMLA-1664/MUM/2016
Page 1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s Armstrong Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
MANMOHAN SINGH
G.C. MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
