FPA-PMLA-1660/MUM/2017 of Mrs. Vidhi Kumar v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
ATFPFPA-PMLA-1660/MUM/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Mrs. Vidhi Kumar V/s The Deputy Director…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
¶2
| 1. MP-PMLA-3181/MUM/2017 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1659/MUM/2017 |
|
|---|---|
| Mrs. Veena Kumar Srivastava … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| 2. MP-PMLA-3182/MUM/2017 Stay FPA-PMLA-1660/MUM/2017 |
|
| Mrs. Vidhi Kumar … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| 3. MP-PMLA-3183/MUM/2017 Stay FPA-PMLA-1661/MUM/2017 |
|
| Mr. Pankaj Kumar Srivastav … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| 4. MP-PMLA-3283/MUM/2017 Stay FPA-PMLA-1614/MUM/2017 |
|
| Smt. Rajeshwari Kulkarni … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| 5. MP-PMLA-3284/MUM/2017 Stay FPA-PMLA-1615/MUM/2017 |
|
| Shri Kiran Kulkarni … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director | |
| Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … | Respondent |
¶3
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
¶4
| For the appellant | : Shri Johnson K. George, Advocate Shri P.Ojha, Advocate (1661 & 1614) |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate |
| For the respondent No. 2 | : Shri P. Ojha, Advocate (in appeal No. 1659-1660/2017) Shri J.K. Georg, Advocate (in appeal no. 1661/2017) |
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH |
: CHAIRMAN |
¶5
ORDER
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Mrs. Veena Kumar Srivastava
- appellant
Mrs. Vidhi Kumar
- appellant
Mr. Pankaj Kumar Srivastav
- appellant
Smt. Rajeshwari Kulkarni
- appellant
Shri Kiran Kulkarni
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · December
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-1660/MUM/2017
- Topic
- Money Laundering
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court