A short order listing multiple memorial and final order numbers under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The matter was listed for a specific date but no substantive decision, reasoning, or disposal is recorded in this text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| 1. MP-PMLA-3181/MUM/2017 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1659/MUM/2017 |
|
|---|---|
| Mrs. Veena Kumar Srivastava … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| 2. MP-PMLA-3182/MUM/2017 Stay FPA-PMLA-1660/MUM/2017 |
|
| Mrs. Vidhi Kumar … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| 3. MP-PMLA-3183/MUM/2017 Stay FPA-PMLA-1661/MUM/2017 |
|
| Mr. Pankaj Kumar Srivastav … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| 4. MP-PMLA-3283/MUM/2017 Stay FPA-PMLA-1614/MUM/2017 |
|
| Smt. Rajeshwari Kulkarni … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| 5. MP-PMLA-3284/MUM/2017 Stay FPA-PMLA-1615/MUM/2017 |
|
| Shri Kiran Kulkarni … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director | |
| Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Johnson K. George, Advocate Shri P.Ojha, Advocate (1661 & 1614) |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate |
| For the respondent No. 2 | : Shri P. Ojha, Advocate (in appeal No. 1659-1660/2017) Shri J.K. Georg, Advocate (in appeal no. 1661/2017) |
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH |
: CHAIRMAN |
ORDER
17.12.2018
FPA-PMLA-1659-1661 & 1614-1615/MUM/2017
At joint request, list on 22nd April, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 17th December, 2018. ‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1659-1661 & 1614-1615/MUM/2017
Page 1 of 1
Veena Kumar Srivastava and Others
Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
