Allowed

FPA-PMLA-1620/BNG/2017 of Sri Chandrashekhar v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore

ATFP16 Feb 2018FPA-PMLA-1620/BNG/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge allowed the appeals against prosecution for money laundering, observing that the appellants were acquitted by the Special Court and no appeal was filed by the state. The order directed the appellant to file a copy of the Lokayukta complaint and the fair copy of charges.

What did the court decide?

The special leave petitions were allowed, holding that the special leave was granted based on the acquittal of the appellants by the Special Court.

FPA-PMLA-1620/BNG/2017 of Sri Chandrashekhar v/s The Joint… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2018)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-PMLA-3101/BNG/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1620/BNG/2017 Sri Chandrashekhar	… Appellant
MP-PMLA-3102/BNG/2017 Stay FPA-PMLA-1621/BNG/2017 Smt. Basavarajeshwari	… Appellant
Versus

¶3

The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent

¶4

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶5

For the appellant : Advocate Appeared For the respondent : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN

¶6

ORDER 16.02.2018

¶7

FPA-PMLA-1620-1621/BNG/2017

¶8

The learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the appellant has been acquitted by the Special Court and the said order has attained finality as no appeal filed by the state. It is also stated by him that the allegation made PMLA complaint filed by the respondent are same. There are no additional material recovered the by the respondent on any independent investigation carried out under the PMLA, 2002. Thus the appeals are liable to be allowed.

¶9

There is no denial on behalf of the respondent about the acquittal

¶10

of the main appellant.

¶11

Order reserved.

¶12

FPA-PMLA-1620-1621/BNG/2017

¶13

Page 1 of 2

¶14

In the meanwhile, the appellant is directed to file the copy of the complaint filed by the Lokayukta. A copy of the complaint filed under PMLA which is pending against the appellant and fair copy of the charge filed against the appellant within three weeks from today.

¶15

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶16

New Delhi, 16^th February, 2018. ‘K’

¶17

FPA-PMLA-1620-1621/BNG/2017

¶18

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-1620/BNG/2017 of Sri Chandrashekhar v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-1620/BNG/2017 of Sri Chandrashekhar v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases