The tribunal permitted the appellant to file an additional affidavit within four weeks to clarify objections, with the respondent required to respond within three weeks. The matter was listed for further hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1594/DLI/2016
M/s. Om Drishian International Ltd. … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. R. S. Sharma, Advocate Mr. Vivek Kumar, Advocate Ms. Shivali Bansal, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Naveen Kr. Matta, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MAN MOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 12.02.2018
FPA-PMLA-1594/DLI/2016
Learned counsel for the appellant after small arguments wishes to file an additional affidavit in view to clarify certain objections raised by this Tribunal within four weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the respondent who may give the response within three weeks.
List on 10th July, 2018.
(Justice ManMohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member New Delhi, 12th February, 2018 ‘AS’ FPA-PMLA-1594/DLI/2016
Page 1 of 1
M/s. Om Drishian International Ltd.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Man Mohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
16 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
