Disposed

FPA-PMLA-1540/GHY /2016 of Shri Ranbir Singh Gandhi v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Guwahati

ATFP13 Aug 2018FPA-PMLA-1540/GHY /2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge of the Appellate Tribunal addressed fresh applications regarding notices under Section 8(4) of the PMLA. The court noted an existing stay and directed the respondent to file a reply without taking coercive steps, listing the matter for hearing.

What did the court decide?

Respondent directed to file reply by 19.09.2018; no coercive steps to be taken by respondent.

FPA-PMLA-1540/GHY /2016 of Shri Ranbir Singh Gandhi v/s The Joint… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2018)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

1. MP-PMLA-4788/GHY/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-2884/GHY/2016 (A.D.) &

¶3

FPA-PMLA-1539/GHY /2016

¶4

Shri Charanjit Singh Gandhi

¶5

… Appellant

¶6

Versus

¶7

The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Guwahati … Respondent

¶8

¶9

2. MP-PMLA-4789/GHY/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-2886/GHY/2016 (Exem.) MP-PMLA-2888/GHY/2016 (A.D.)

¶10

¶11

FPA-PMLA-1540/GHY /2016

¶12

Shri Ranbir Singh Gandhi … Appellant

¶13

Versus

¶14

The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Guwahati … Respondent

¶15

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶16

For the Appellant : Mr. Nalin Kohli, Advocate Mr. Ankit Roy, Advocate For the Respondent : Mrs. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate on Behalf of Mr. Nitesh Rana, Advocate

¶17

CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH

¶18

: CHAIRMAN

¶19

ORDER 13.08.2018

¶20

FPA-PMLA-1539/GHY/2016 & FPA-PMLA-1540/GHY/2016

¶21

Fresh applications have been mentioned in view of the fresh notice issued under Section 8(4). Copy of the application was served to the respondent. However, the main counsel Mr. Nitesh Rana, Advocate is not present. Mrs. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate appeared on his

¶22

FPA-PMLA-1539/GHY/2016

¶23

& FPA-PMLA-1540/GHY/2016

¶24

Page 1 of 2

¶25

behalf. It appears from various orders that interim order has already been issued. Even it was confirmed till the disposal of the appeal by the order dated 13^th March, 2018. Despite of the passing of the order, the notice under Section 8(4) has been issued. Let the reply be filed by the learned counsel for the respondent by the next date i.e. on 19^th September, 2018.

¶26

In the meanwhile, no coercive steps shall be taken by the respondent in view of the notice issued under Section 8(4) of the PMLA.

¶27

The above mentioned application may also be listed on the next date of hearing.

¶28

List on 19^th September. 2018.

¶29

Copy of the order be given ‘ dasti ’ to both the parties.

¶30

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶31

New Delhi, 13^th August, 2018

¶32

‘AS’

¶33

FPA-PMLA-1539/GHY/2016

¶34

& FPA-PMLA-1540/GHY/2016

¶35

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-1540/GHY /2016 of Shri Ranbir Singh Gandhi v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Guwahati

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-1540/GHY /2016 of Shri Ranbir Singh Gandhi v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Guwahati

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases