Appeal against direction specious proceeding under PMLA. Upper Tribunal directed parties to file written synopsis within four weeks. Order reserved.
Appeal considered where direction was issued to initiate investigation. Upper Tribunal did not decide substantive issue at the hearing. Parties granted liberty to file written synopsis for further proceedings. Process order in PMLA adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-2916/DLI/2016 (Stay)
FPA-PMLA-1528/DLI/2016
Century Comm Ltd. … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Madhav Khurana, Advocate Shri Aalam Nijjar, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent |
: Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate |
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH |
: CHAIRMAN |
ORDER 11.05.2018
FPA-PMLA-1528/DLI/2016
Heard parties. Order reserved. The parties are granted liberty to file
the written synopsis within four weeks.
(Justice Manmohan Singh)
Chairman
New Delhi,
11th May, 2018
‘d’
FPA-PMLA-1528/DLI/2016
Page 1 of 1
Century Comm Ltd.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
