FPA-PMLA-1497/BNG/2016 of Mallikarjun v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Case brief
What is this about?
The Appellate Tribunal directed the appellant to file complaints and charges within three weeks before giving the final order on appeal maintainability.
What did the court decide?
Directed appellant to file Lokayukta complaint copy and PMLA charge copy within three weeks.
What the court decided
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| MP-PMLA-2838/BNG/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1494/BNG/2016 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Sri Laxminarayan |
… | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-2839/BNG/2016 Stay FPA-PMLA-1495/BNG/2016 |
||
| Ramchandra Rao |
… | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-2840/BNG/2016 Stay | ||
| FPA-PMLA-1496/BNG/2016 | ||
| Sri Pandari |
… | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-2841/BNG/2016 Stay FPA-PMLA-1497/BNG/2016 |
||
| Mallikarjun |
… | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-2842/BNG/2016 Stay FPA-PMLA-1498/BNG/2016 |
||
| Smt. Nirmala Dodla |
… | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-1254/BNG/2016 | ||
| Sri Prasanna Rao |
… | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore | … | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Raj Kumar, C.A. |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
ORDER 16.02.2018
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether appeals under PMLA are maintainable when appellants were acquitted by the Special Court and no additional material was recovered in PMLA proceedings.
Whether the acquittal of the main appellant binds the jurisdiction of the Appellate Tribunal in the absence of independent investigation under PMLA.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Laxminarayan
- appellant
Ramchandra Rao
- appellant
Pandari
- appellant
Mallikarjun
- appellant
Nirmala Dodla
- appellant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · February
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-1497/BNG/2016
- Topic
- Money Laundering
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court