A single-line order by the Appellate Tribunal, PMLA, stayed the list and granted four weeks for the respondent to file a written synopsis. No substantive decision on merits was rendered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. MP-PMLA-2647/AHD/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1414/AHD/2016
Hitendrsingh Hamirsingh Wasghela … Appellant 2. MP-PMLA-2650/AHD/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1415/AHD/2016 Ketan Mahadevbhai Patel … Appellant 3. MP-PMLA-2653/AHD/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1416/AHD/2016 Uday Navinchandra Sangani … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmadabad … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellants : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate For the respondent : Mohd. Faraz, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G. C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 10.07.2018
FPA-PMLA-1414-1416/AHD/2016
Counsel for the respondent seeks some more time to file the
written synopsis. Let the same be filed within four weeks.
List on 29th January, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G. C. Mishra)
Member
New Delhi, 10th July, 2018
‘S’
FPA-PMLA-1414-1416/AHD/2016
Page 1 of 1
Hitendrsingh Hamirsingh Wasghela
Ketan Mahadevbhai Patel
Uday Navinchandra Sangani
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmadabad
Manmohan Singh
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
