Single judge appeal regarding the untimely submission of a written synopsis by the respondent. The Tribunal adjourned the matter for six weeks.
Respondent granted six weeks to file the written synopsis with an advance copy to the appellant's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| MP-PMLA-3663/AHD/2016 (Misc.) |
|
|---|---|
| MP-PMLA-1479/AHD/2015 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-53/AHD/2010 (SP) & FPA-PMLA-122/AHD/2010 |
|
| Shri Nikunj Babulal Modi | … Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-1480/AHD/2015 (Misc.) |
|
| & FPA-PMLA-135/AHD/2010 |
|
| SH.Babulal Shantilal Modi | … Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-1481/AHD/2015 (Misc.) |
|
| & FPA-PMLA-136/AHD/2010 MS Madhubala Babulal Modi |
… Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-1482/AHD/2015 (Misc.) & FPA-PMLA-137/AHD/2010 MS Hetal Nikunj Modi |
… Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-1483/AHD/2015 (Misc.) & FPA-PMLA-138/AHD/2010 |
|
| Mrs. Ramilaben Govindbhai khalas | … Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-1484/AHD/2015 (Misc.) & FPA-PMLA-139/AHD/2010 Mr. Sandip Govindbhai Khalas |
… Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-1485/AHD/2015 (Misc.) & FPA-PMLA-140/AHD/2010 Sh.Vijay Govindbhai Khalas |
… Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-1486/AHD/2015 (Misc.) & FPA-PMLA-141/AHD/2010 Sh. Govindbhai Narandas Khalas |
… Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-1487/AHD/2015 (Misc.) & FPA-PMLA-142/AHD/2010 Shri Nikunj Babulal Modi |
… Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-2451/AHD/2015 (Recall.) & FPA-PMLA-149/AHD/2011 |
|
| Sh. Naresh Natwarlal Panchal | … Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-2449/AHD/2015 (Recall.) & FPA-PMLA-150/AHD/2010 Smt. Roopal Naresh Panchal |
… Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-2450/AHD/2015 (Recall.) & FPA-PMLA-156/AHD/2010 Arjav Nareshbhai Panchal |
… Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-146/AHD/2011 | |
Narmadaben maneklal Panchal |
… Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-147/AHD/2011 |
|
| Sh Rajesh Kantilal Panchal | … Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-122, 135-142, 146-157 & 562, 269 /AHD/2010 | Page |
Page 1 of 3
| FPA-PMLA-148/AHD/2011 | |
|---|---|
| Smt. Samita Rajesh Panchal | … Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-151/AHD/2011 |
|
| Sh. Deepak Jitmal Shah |
… Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-152/AHD/2011 |
|
| Smt. Pushpa Deepak Shah |
… Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-153/AHD/2011 | |
| DEEPAK JASVANTLAL PANCHAL |
… Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-154/AHD/2011 | |
| DEEVANGI DIPAKBHAI PANCHAL |
… Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-155/AHD/2011 | |
| PRAMILABEN RANCHHODLAL PANCHAL | … Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-157/AHD/2011 | |
| Ranchhodlal Nanalal Panchal | … Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-562/AHD/2011 | |
| Devangi D Panchal | … Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-269/AHD/2011 Dipak J Panchal |
… Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Joint Director | |
| Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad | … Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Sumit Shah, Advocate Mr. N. M. Kapadia, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER
05.12.2018
FPA-PMLA-122, 135-142, 146-157 & 562, 269 /AHD/2010
Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, Counsel for the respondent has made his submission for some time.
He seeks some time to file the written synopsis with regard to the transfer of amount out of IDFC or Yes Bank IPO in the various accounts maintained by the ICICI Bank.
FPA-PMLA-122, 135-142, 146-157 & 562, 269 /AHD/2010
Page 2 of 3
Let the same be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant, who may file the response by the next date of hearing.
List on 8th February, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 05th December, 2018.
‘s’
FPA-PMLA-122, 135-142, 146-157 & 562, 269 /AHD/2010
Page 3 of 3
Shri Nikunj Babulal Modi, Shri Babulal Shantilal Modi, MS Madhubala Babulal Modi, MS Hetal Nikunj Modi, Mrs. Ramilaben Govindbhai khalas, Mr. Sandip Govindbhai
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
20 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
