FPA-PMLA-1398/JL/2016 of Mr. Gurjit Kumar Gaba v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar
ATFPFPA-PMLA-1398/JL/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Mr. Gurjit Kumar Gaba V/s The Deputy…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
¶2
| 1. MP-PMLA-2676/JL/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1398/JL/2016 |
|
|---|---|
| Mr. Gurjit Kumar Gaba … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar … |
Respondent |
| 2. MP-PMLA-2678/JL/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1399/JL/2016 |
|
| Mr. Chunni Lal Gaba … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar … |
Respondent |
| 3. MP-PMLA-2680/JL/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1400/JL/2016 |
|
| Mr. Gurmesh Kumar Gaba … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar … |
Respondent |
| Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appea | red |
| For the Appellants : Mr. Rajat B |
hardwaj, Advocate |
| For the Respondent : Mr. Atul Tri |
pathi, Advocate |
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN |
|
| ORDER 04.10.2018 |
|
| FPA-PMLA-1398-1400/JL/2016 | |
| Re-notify on 15thFebruary, 2019. (Justice |
Manmohan Singh) Chairman |
| New Delhi, | |
| 04thOctober, 2018 |
|
| FPA-PMLA-1398-1400/JL/2016 ‘AS’ |
Page 1 of 1 |
¶3
Page 1 of 1
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Gurjit Kumar Gaba
- appellant
Mr. Chunni Lal Gaba
- appellant
Mr. Gurmesh Kumar Gaba
- respondent
The Deputy Director
- respondent
Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · October
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-1398/JL/2016
- Topic
- Money Laundering
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court