The tribunal granted a four-week extension to the respondent to file a reply, allowing time for the appellant to submit a rejoinder. The matter is listed for further hearing on 4th October, 2018. No substantive decision was rendered in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2546/MUM/2015 (Mics) MP-PMLA-2122/MUM/2015 (Mics) FPA-PMLA-827/MUM/2015 Yashovardhan Birla … Appellant MP-PMLA-2629/MUM/2016 (COD) FPA-PMLA-1394/MUM/2016 Nirved Traders Pvt. Ltd … Appellant MP-PMLA-2630/MUM/2016 (COD)) FPA-PMLA-1395/MUM/2016 Godavari Corporation Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant MP-PMLA-2631/MUM/2016 (COD) FPA-PMLA-1396/MUM/2016 Shearson Investment Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant MP-PMLA-2632/MUM/2016 (COD) FPA-PMLA-1397/MUM/2016 Mr. Yashovardhan Birla … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : ShriMudit Jain, Advocate Shri Mukesh Sharma, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent |
: Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
ORDER 04.04.2018
FPA-PMLA-827/MUM/2015, FPA-PMLA 1394-1397/MUM/2016
Time is granted to the respondent to file the reply within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 4th October, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 4th April, 2018
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-827/MUM/2015, FPA-PMLA 1394-1397/MUM/2016
Page 1 of 1
Yashovardhan Birla
Nirved Traders Pvt. Ltd
Godavari Corporation Pvt. Ltd.
Shearson Investment Pvt. Ltd.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
