Multiple appeals under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act were listed for hearing but adjourned due to time constraints. The Appeals Tribunal did not decide the merits or dispose of the matters in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| MP-PMLA-3663/AHD/2017 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-1479/AHD/2015 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-53/AHD/2010 (SP) & |
|
|---|---|
FPA-PMLA-122/AHD/2010 |
|
| Shri Nikunj Babulal Modi | … Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-1480/AHD/2015 (Misc.) & |
|
| FPA-PMLA-135/AHD/2010 | |
| Shri Babulal Shantilal Modi | … Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-1481/AHD/2015 (Misc.) & |
|
| FPA-PMLA-136/AHD/2010 | |
| Ms. Madhubala Babulal Modi | … Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-1482/AHD/2015 (Misc.) & |
|
FPA-PMLA-137/AHD/2010 |
|
| Ms. Hetal Nikunj Modi | … Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-1483/AHD/2015 (Misc.) & |
|
| FPA-PMLA-138/AHD/2010 | |
| Mrs. Ramilaben Govindbhai Khalas | … Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-1484/AHD/2015 (Misc.) & |
|
FPA-PMLA-139/AHD/2010 |
|
| Mr. Sandip Govindbhai Khalas | … Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-1485/AHD/2015 (Misc.) & |
|
| FPA-PMLA-140/AHD/2010 | |
Shri Vijay Govindbhai Khalas |
… Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-1486/AHD/2015 (Misc.) & |
|
| FPA-PMLA-141/AHD/2010 | |
| Shri Govindbhai Narandas Khalas |
… Appellant |
| A-122, 135-142/AHD/2010, | Page 1 of 3 |
FPA-PMLA-122, 135-142/AHD/2010, FPA-PMLA- 149-150, 156, 146-148, 151-155, 157/AHD/2011, FPA-PMLA-562/AHD/2014 & FPA-PMLA-269/AHD/2011
| MP-PMLA-1487/AHD/2015 (Misc.) & |
||
|---|---|---|
| FPA-PMLA-142/AHD/2010 | ||
| Shri Sanjay Govindbhai Khalas | … | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-2451/AHD/2016 (Recall.) & |
||
| FPA-PMLA-149/AHD/2011 | ||
| Shri Naresh Natwarlal Panchal | … | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-2449/AHD/2016 (Recall.) & |
||
FPA-PMLA-150/AHD/2011 |
||
| Smt. Roopal Naresh Panchal | … | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-2450/AHD/2016 (Recall.) & |
||
| FPA-PMLA-156/AHD/2011 | ||
| Arjav Nareshbhai Panchal | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-146/AHD/2011 Narmadaben Maneklal Panchal |
… | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-147/AHD/2011 Shri Rajesh Kantilal Panchal |
… | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-148/AHD/2011 Smt. Samita Rajesh Panchal |
… | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-151/AHD/2011 Shri Deepak Jitmal Shah |
… | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-152/AHD/2011 | ||
| Smt. Pushpa Deepak Shah | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-153/AHD/2011 | ||
| Deepak Jasvantlal Panchal | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-154/AHD/2011 | ||
| Deevangi Dipakbhai Panchal | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-155/AHD/2011 | ||
| Pramilaben Ranchhodlal Panchal | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-157/AHD/2011 | ||
| Ranchhodlal Nanalal Panchal | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-562/AHD/2014 | ||
| Devangi D.Panchal | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-122, 135-142/AHD/2010, |
Page 2 of 3 | |
| FPA-PMLA- 149-150, 156, 146-148, 151-155, 157/AHD/2011, FPA-PMLA-562/AHD/2014 & FPA-PMLA-269/AHD/2011 |
FPA-PMLA-269/AHD/2011 Dipak J. Panchal … Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellants | : Shri Sumit Shah, Advocate for Shri N.M. Kapadia, Adv. |
|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : Shri Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate |
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH |
: CHAIRMAN |
ORDER 05.07.2018
FPA-PMLA-122, 135-142/AHD/2010, FPA-PMLA- 149-150, 156, 146148, 151-155, 157/AHD/2011, FPA-PMLA-562/AHD/2014 & FPAPMLA-269/AHD/2011
Shri Rajesh Awasthi, Learned counsel has made his submissions for some time. No time is left. List on 04.09.2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 05th July, 2018
‘SKB’
FPA-PMLA-122, 135-142/AHD/2010, FPA-PMLA- 149-150, 156, 146-148, 151-155, 157/AHD/2011, FPA-PMLA-562/AHD/2014 & FPA-PMLA-269/AHD/2011
Page 3 of 3
Nikunj Babulal Modi and Others
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad
Man Mohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
20 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
