Order listing proceedings on 18th July, 2018, allowing parties to file written synopsis and disclose pendency in other courts.
In a taxation under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, the Appellate Tribunal listed the matter for hearing and directed parties to file written synopses disclosing pendency in other courts.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1374/CHN/2016 Union Bank of India … Appellant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Rajiv Sagar, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER ORDER 24.04.2018
FPA-PMLA-1374/CHN/2016
Both the parties are also allowed to file the written synopsis. In the written synopsis, they will also disclose about the pendency of the proceeding in other courts.
List on 18th July, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 24th April, 2018 ‘A’ FPA-PMLA-1374/CHN/2016
Page 1 of 1
Union Bank of India
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
16 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
