Order listing a stay application for three PMLA cases. The principal counsel for the appellant could not appear due to illness, so the application was listed for the following date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2787/CHD/2016 (Stay) MP-PMLA-2599/CHD/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1363/CHD/2016
Sunita … Appellant Versus The Assistant Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri V.K. Sabharwal, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 23.04.2018
FPA-PMLA-1363/CHD/2016 MP-PMLA-2787/CHD/2016 (Stay) & MPPMLA-2599/CHD/2016 (Stay)
The main arguing counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant is confined to bed due to severe prelatic attack. Counsel and seeks an adjournment which is not opposed.
List on 24th September, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 23rd April, 2018 ‘D’
FPA-PMLA-1363/CHD/2016
Page 1 of 1
Sunita
The Assistant Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh
Justice Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
16 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
