FPA-PMLA-1316/DLI/2016 of Sangeeta Tygi v/s The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
ATFPFPA-PMLA-1316/DLI/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This order records that appellants seek time to file an Italian Court judgment copy acquitting the accused and notes the prosecution complaint filing.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
¶2
| 1. MP-PMLA-2550/DLI/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1287/DLI/2016 |
|
|---|---|
| Sanjeev Tyagi | … Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi |
… Respondent |
| 2. MP-PMLA-2563/DLI/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1310/DLI/2016 |
|
| Krishanayan | … Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi |
… Respondent |
| 3. MP-PMLA-2613/DLI/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1316/DLI/2016 |
|
| Sangeeta Tygi | … Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi |
… Respondent |
| 4. MP-PMLA-2565/DLI/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1311/DLI/2016 |
|
| Neel Krish | … Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi |
… Respondent |
| Advocates/Authorized Representatives | who appeared |
| For the appellant : |
Shri Manav Gupta, Advocate Ms. Esha Dutta, Advocate |
| For the respondent : |
Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : SHRI G.C. MISHRA : |
CHAIRMAN MEMBER |
| ORDER 26.07.201 |
8 |
¶3
FPA-PMLA-1287,1310, 1316 & 1311/DLI/2016
¶4
Page 1 of 2
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the appellants are granted additional time to file the Italian Court judgment copy.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Sanjeev Tyagi
- appellant
Krishanayan
- appellant
Sangeeta Tygi
- appellant
Neel Krish
- respondent
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · July
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-1316/DLI/2016
- Topic
- Money Laundering
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court