FPA-PMLA-1249/JL/2016 of Satpal Bansal v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar
Case brief
What is this about?
Appellants sought adjournment citing illness. Matter adjourned to 29th August 2018. Order contains no substantive legal principles or decision on merits.
What the court decided
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1248/JL/2016 Raj Rani … Applicant/Appellant FPA-PMLA-1249/JL/2016 Satpal Bansal … Applicant/Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : None |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Mohd. Faraz, Advocate |
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH |
: CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
ORDER 03.05.2018
FPA-PMLA-1248-1249/JL/2016
Mr. Vinay Malhotra, Advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant
is not keeping fit. Adjournment is sought on behalf of the appellant.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Raj Rani
- appellant
Satpal Bansal
- respondent
Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar
Coram
All orders in this case
14 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court