The Appellate Tribunal listed the appeal for further hearing after the respondent's counsel requested four weeks time to file a reply.
The matter is adjourned for the respondent to file its reply. No substantive decision is rendered in this order. This is a procedural order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2395/MUM/2016 (Misc.) FPA-PMLA-1238/MUM/2016
Smt. Pranita Prashant Chamankar … Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Sh. Nitin Sangra and Sh Anurag Singh, Advocates |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
ORDER 17.01.2018
FPA-PMLA-1238/MUM/2016
The learned counsel for the appellant submits that no reply to the application filed by the respondent. Sh. Tripathi states that Sh. S.A. Saud, learned counsel appearing in the matter earlier and now the same has been allotted to him. He seeks time to go through the matter. He further seeks time to file the reply. Reply be filed within four weeks.
List the appeal on 26th April, 2018
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member New Delhi, 17th January, 2018. ‘M’
FPA-PMLA-1238/MUM/2016
Page 1 of 1
Smt. Pranita Prashant Chamankar
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
17 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
