Notwithstanding the order dismissing the appeal on merits elsewhere, this bench adjourned the matter for four weeks to allow the respondent advocate (Sh. Atul Tripathi) time to file a reply to the appellant's application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| MP-PMLA-4029/MUM/2016 (Sta MP-PMLA-2393/MUM/2016 (Mis FPA-PMLA-1236/MUM/2016 Krishna Shantaram Chamankar Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumb Advocates/Authorized Representativ |
y) c.) … Appellant ai … Respondent es who appeared |
|---|---|
| For the appellant : | Sh. Nitin Sangra and Sh Anurag Singh, Advocates |
| For the respondent : |
Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : SHRI G.C. MISHRA : |
CHAIRMAN MEMBER |
ORDER 17.01.2018
FPA-PMLA-1236/MUM/2016
The learned counsel for the appellant submits that no reply to the application filed by the respondent. Sh. Tripathi states that Sh. S.A. Saud, learned counsel appearing in the matter earlier and now the same has been allotted to him. He seeks time to go through the matter. He further seeks time to file the reply. Reply be filed within four weeks.
List the appeal on 26th April, 2018
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member New Delhi, 17th January, 2018. ‘M’
FPA-PMLA-1236/MUM/2016
Page 1 of 1
Krishna Shantaram Chamankar
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement
Justice Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
17 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
