The tribunal allowed the applicant's appeal to restore a previously dismissed appeal against the delay in filing, imposing a cost of Rs. 5,000.
Restoration of appeal allowed subject to payment of Rs. 5,000 cost; pleadings marked complete.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3645/KOL/2017 (Rest.) &
In FPA-PMLA-1222/KOL/2016
Rose Valley Real Estate & Constructions Ltd.
… Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Sangam Kumar, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SMT. ANANYA RAY : MEMBER
ORDER 02.02.2018
MP-PMLA-3645/KOL/2017 (Rest.) & In FPA-PMLA-1222/KOL/2016
Reply has not been filed by the respondent. However the Ld. counsel for the respondent Shri Vikas Garg opposes the restoration application (ROA). He states that the appeal was dismissed on 23rd March, 2017 and the restoration application has been filed only on 27th July, 2017.
For the reason stated in the application, the ROA is allowed, however, subject to the cost of Rs. 5,000/- which shall be paid on or before the next date. Cost is imposed on this ground that the application has been filed after a delay of more than three and half months. The appeal is accordingly restored. Pleadings are complete.
In FPA-PMLA-1222/KOL/2016
Page 1 of 2
List for argument on 20th July, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Ananya Ray)
Member
New Delhi,
02nd February, 2018
‘A’
In FPA-PMLA-1222/KOL/2016
Page 2 of 2
Rose Valley Real Estate & Constructions Ltd.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata
Manmohan Singh
Ananya Ray
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
