The Appellate Tribunal listed the appeals for a date in January 2019 after Counsel for the appellant suggested discontinuing the appeal if attachment continues till trial, seeking time from the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| FPA-PMLA-1214/LKW/2016 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Siddarth Singh | … | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-3800/LKW/2017 (A.E.) FPA-PMLA-1215/LKW/2016 |
||
| Brahma Prakash Singh | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-1216/LKW/2016 | ||
| Satya Prakash Singh | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-1217/LKW/2016 | ||
| Kamini Singh | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow | … | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : Shri Dharmender Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER
17.12.2018
FPA-PMLA-1214-1217/LKW/2016
The counsel for the appellant has suggested that his clients may not press the appeal if only the attachment shall continue till end of trial and final conclusion given by the special court under PMLA. Counsel for the respondent seeks time to take the instructions.
List on 14th January, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi,
17th December, 2018. ‘K’ FPA-PMLA-1214-1217/LKW/2016
Page 1 of 1
Siddarth Singh
Brahma Prakash Singh
Satya Prakash Singh
Kamini Singh
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
