Appellate Tribunal allowed partial filing of written synopsis by parties and reserved the order in four connected appeals under PMLA.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| FPA-PMLA-1214/LKW/2016 Siddarth Singh |
… | Appellant |
|---|---|---|
| MP-PMLA-3800/LKW/2017 (A.E.) & FPA-PMLA-1215/LKW/2016 |
||
| Brahma Prakash Singh | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-1216/LKW/2016 Satya Prakash Singh |
… | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-1217/LKW/2016 | ||
| Kamini Singh | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow | … | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellants | : Shri Dharmender Kumar, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| ORDER 23.07.2018 |
FPA-PMLA-1214-1217/LKW/2016
Both the parties are allowed to file the written synopsis. Order reserved.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 23rd July, 2018
‘A’
FPA-PMLA-1214-1217/LKW/2016
Page 1 of 1
Siddarth Singh
Brahma Prakash Singh
Satya Prakash Singh
Kamini Singh
Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
