The Appellate Tribunal listed the appeal for final arguments instead of disposing of the Miscellaneous Petition, noting the appellant's readiness to argue on merits.
Appeal listed for final arguments on 1st May, 2018; pending applications disposed accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2874/HYD/2016 (Misc)
FPA-PMLA-1191/HYD/2016
M/s Pioneer Holiday Resort Limited … Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : None For the respondent : Mohd. Faraz, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 13.03.2018
FPA-PMLA-1191/HYD/2016 & MP-PMLA-2874/HYD/2016 (Misc)
The learned Counsel for the appellant states that instead of passing the order in the Miscellaneous Petition, the appellant is prepared to argue the appeal on merits.
List this appeal for final arguments on 1st May, 2018. All pending applications are disposed of accordingly.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 13th March, 2018 ‘r’
FPA-PMLA-1191/HYD/2016
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Miscellaneous Petition should have been decided on merits rather than as an interlocutory order.
M/s Pioneer Holiday Resort Limited
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
