Appeal against an adverse order was listed for adjudication. Counsel for the appellant was unavailable, leading to an adjournment of the matter until August 2, 2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2229/DLI/2015 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1126/DLI/2015 Smt. Chanda Devi … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : None |
|---|---|
| For Respondent |
: Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH SHRI G.C. MISHRA |
: CHAIRMAN : MEMBER |
| ORDER | |
| 15.02.2018 |
FPA-PMLA-1126/DLI/2015
Counsel for the appellant is not available. An adjournment is sought.
Re-notify on 02nd August, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 15th February, 2018 ‘A’
FPA-PMLA-1126/DLI/2015
Page 1 of 1
Chanda Devi
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
