A procedural interlocutory order fixing dates for filing a reply and rejoinder in an appeal against attachment orders under the PMLA, noting obstruction due to unpaid filing fee and directing payment.
Reply admitted upon payment of cost; rejoinder timeline fixed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3327/IDR/2017 (Rest.) In FPA-PMLA-1037/INDORE/2015
Dr. Jagdeesh Sagar … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Indore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Dr. Jagdeesh Singh Sagar For the respondent : Ms. Sanjana Rajput, Advocate on behalf of Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 17.08.2018
MP-PMLA-3327/IDR/2017 (Rest.) In FPA-PMLA-1037/INDORE/2015
Reply has not been filed. The learned counsel for the respondent states that the same could not be filed as the cost of Rs. 10,000/- is not paid in terms of order dated 10th March, 2016. The learned counsel for the appellant agrees to give cost to the learned counsel for the respondent during the course of the day.
Therefore, reply be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 17th January, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 17th August, 2018
‘d’
FPA-PMLA-1037/INDORE/2015 Page 1 of 1
Dr. Jagdeesh Sagar
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Indore
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
