Appeals challenging detention orders under PMLA before the Tribunal at New Delhi were heard. No counsel appeared for the appellants. The appeals filed were dismissed outright by the chairman without detailed reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-1930/CHN/2015 (Stay) MP-PMLA-1931/CHN/2015 (COD) FPA-PMLA-1027/CHN/2015
R. Joseph Premkumar … Applicant/Appellant
MP-PMLA-1933/CHN/2015 (Stay) MP-PMLA-1934/CHN/2015 (COD) FPA-PMLA-1028/CHN/2015
D. Suresh Rao … Applicant/Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : None For the respondent : Shri Atul Tripathi, E.D. CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 03.07.2018
FPA-PMLA-1027-1028/CHN/2015
No one appears on behalf of the appellant. The appeal is dismissed.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 3rd July, 2018.
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1027-1028/CHN/2015
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeals filed against the一九三零 and一九三一 orders be allowed.
R. Joseph Premkumar
D. Suresh Rao
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
