FPA-ND-3/LKW /2002 of Siraj Khan v/s The Competent Authority, Lucknow
Case brief
What is this about?
Siraj Khan V/s The Competent Authority…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
MP-ND-164/LKW/2017 MP-ND-169/LKW/2017 MP-ND-170/LKW/2017 MP-ND-18/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-ND-1/LKW/2013 FPA-ND-3/LKW /2002
Siraj Khan … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Competent Authority, Lucknow … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant : | Shri S.K. Srivastava, Advocate Mr. C.D. Rai, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent : |
Shri Munish Kumar, Advocate Shri D.S. Bisht, Joint Commissioner |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : SHRI G.C. MISHRA : |
CHAIRMAN MEMBER |
| ORDER | |
| 08.08.201 | 8 |
FPA-ND-3/LKW /2002
The learned counsel for the appellant states that the Hon’ble Delhi
High Court has passed the conditional order while disposing at appeal. However, he does not have the copy of the same order.
Let the copy of the order be produced on the next date of hearing.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Siraj Khan
- respondent
The Competent Authority, Lucknow
Coram
Manmohan Singh
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court