An order by the Appellate Tribunal for the NDPS Act allowing the respondent time to file a synopsis and listing the matter for a subsequent hearing. No substantive decision was rendered.
Allowed the respondent some time to file written synopsis; matter listed for next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCOTROPIC SUBSTANSES ACT AT NEW DELHI
| MP-ND-52/DLI/2016 FPA-ND-68/DLI/2016 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Kehar Singh | … | Appellant |
| MP-ND-53/DLI/2016 | ||
| FPA-ND-69/DLI/2016 |
||
| Sukhwinder Singh | … | Appellant |
| MP-ND-54/DLI/2016 | ||
| FPA-ND-70/DLI/2016 | ||
| Pritam Kaur | … | Appellant |
| MP-ND-55/DLI/2016 | ||
| FPA-ND-71/DLI/2016 | ||
| Sukhdev Singh | … | Appellant |
| MP-ND-56/DLI/2016 | ||
| FPA-ND-72/DLI/2016 | ||
| Gurpreet Singh | … | Appellant |
| MP-ND-57/DLI/2016 | ||
| FPA-ND-73/DLI/2016 | ||
| Tarsem Kaur | … | Appellant |
| MP-ND-58/DLI/2016 | ||
| FPA-ND-74/DLI/2016 | ||
| Amar Singh | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Competent Authority, Delhi | … | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellant | : | Mr. U.S. Dnindsa & Mr. Ashok Giri, Advocates |
|---|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : | Mr. Munish Kumar, Advocate |
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH |
: | CHAIRMAN |
FPA-ND-68-74/DLI/2016
Page 1 of 2
ORDER 05.10.2018
FPA-ND-68-74/DLI/2016
Counsel for the respondent seeks some more time to address the
argument as well as to file the written synopsis. Let the same be done by the next date.
List on 15th February, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi,
5th October, 2018
‘K’
FPA-ND-68-74/DLI/2016
Page 2 of 2
Kehar Singh
Sukhwinder Singh
Pritam Kaur
Sukhdev Singh
Gurpreet Singh
Tarsem Kaur
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
