The Appellate Tribunal listed the appeal for hearing after the appellant informed the court of intent to submit original documents. The court directed consideration of the substantive point only after reviewing these documents. No decision was recorded on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
MP-ND-53/DLI/2016
FPA-ND-69/DLI/2016
Sukhwinder Singh … Appellant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Delhi
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Ashok G. Advocate Sh. US Dhindso, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri D.S. Bisht, Joint Commissioner Shri Munish Kumar, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
ORDER 22.03.2018
FPA-ND-69/DLI/2016
After small hearing for both the parties, the learned counsel for the appellant states that on the next date of hearing he will be producing original documents and other related document along with English translated copy of the same.
The point raised by the learned counsel for the appellant would be
considered after consideration of the documents.
List on 5th July, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member New Delhi, 22nd March, 2018 ‘s’
FPA-ND-69/DLI/2016 Page 1 of 1
Sukhwinder Singh
The Competent Authority, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
