Appeals were dismissed in default as the appellant failed to appear on the second hearing date, despite a previous order staying recovery.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. FPA-FE-1/MUM/2012
Sh. Sheroz Malik
… Appellant / Applicant
&
2. FPA-FE-2/MUM/2012
Sh. Badshah Malik … Appellant / Applicant Versus The Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellants | : None |
|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : Mrs. Aagam Kaur, Legal Consultant |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
ORDER 20.03.2018
FPA-FE-1 & 2/MUM/2012
On 15th July, 2016 the following order was passed:
“ Taken up today. The arguments in the instant appeals were heard on 30.06.2016 and after duly notifying the date of pronouncement of Order the Order is ready for delivery.
The appellant filed the application for modification of order.
When the matter is taken up on second time, no one appears on behalf of
the appellant.
FPA-FE-1 & 2/MUM/2012
Page 1 of 2
The appeals are dismissed in default.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 20th March, 2018
‘AS’
FPA-FE-1 & 2/MUM/2012
Page 2 of 2
Sheroz Malik
Badshah Malik
MANMOHAN SINGH
G.C. MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
