The Adjudicating Officer listed a stay application for November 15, 2018, giving the appellant one day to submit financial details regarding hardship before deciding on further adjournment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS, PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. FPA-FE-979/DLI/2004 Shri Deep Swarup Aagarwal … Appellant 2. FPA-FE-942/DLI/2004 Sh. Ratinder Pal Bhatia … Appellant 3. FPA-FE-943/DLI/2004 Sh. Pankaj Soni … Appellant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant at sr. no. 1 : Ms. Sonam N. Kohli Advocate For the appellant at sr. no. 2 & 3 : None For the respondent : Shri Pankaj Yadav, Legal Consultant CORAM MS. ANANYA RAY : MEMBER
ORDER 04.10.2018
FPA-FE-979, 942 & 943/DLI/2004
No one appears in appeal no. FAP-FE-942 &943/DLI/2004.
In FPA-FE-979/DLI/2004 after hearing both the parties for some
time, it appears that there are some questions which needs to be answered by the appellant. The ld. counsel for the appellant seeks a short adjournment.
The leaned counsel for the appellant will come prepared on the next day with all the details as discussed during the course of hearing today, along with the current financial status if they are pleading
FPA-FE-979, 942& 943/DLI/2004
Page 1 of 2
financial hardship. The learned counsel for the respondent has no objection.
List stay application on 15th November, 2018. No further adjournment would be given.
(Ananya Ray) Member
New Delhi,
4th October, 2018. ‘s’
FPA-FE-979, 942& 943/DLI/2004
Page 2 of 2
Deep Swarup Aagarwal
Ratinder Pal Bhatia
Pankaj Soni
Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Ananya Ray
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
