The Appeals Tribunal dismissed two Foreign Exchange Management Act appeals due to the non-appearance of the appellants' counsel, ruling them in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| 1. FPA-FE-89/MUM/2014 Shri Dhirubhai Shanjibhai Italiya … Appellant |
|---|
| Versus |
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent |
| & |
| 2. FPA-FE-90/MUM/2014 Shri Tarun Nagjibhai Italiya … Appellant |
| Versus |
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent |
| Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared |
| For the Appellants : None |
| For the Respondent : Mrs. Agam Kaur, Legal Consultant |
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN |
ORDER 07.08.2018 |
FPA-FE-89 & 90/MUM/2014
It appears that the counsel for the appellants is not appearing in
the matter for the last number of dates.
Both the appeals are dismissed in default.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 07th August, 2018
‘AS’
FPA-FE-89 & 90/MUM/2014
Page 1 of 1
Dhirubhai Shanjibhai Italiya
Tarun Nagjibhai Italiya
The Special Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
