The Tribunal heard and granted a short adjournment to the appellant due to main counsel's unavailability, listing the old matter for 23rd April, 2018.
The tribunal, acting in the interest of justice, allowed a short adjournment request for the appellant citing counsel unavailability and listed the case for final hearing on 23rd April, 2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-FE-71/MUM/1998
Shri Ashik Shah (L.R.) … Appellant Versus The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Manish Shukla, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Prashant Pandey, Legal Consultant CORAM SMT. ANANYA RAY : MEMBER ORDER 07.02.2018
FPA-FE-71/MUM/1998
Proxy counsel for the appellant Shri Manish Shukla states that main counsel is busy in some other court and hence requested for an adjournment. The learned counsel for the respondent objects to the same as all these are very old matters and are ready for final hearing.
In the interest of justice, short adjournment is given.
List on 23rd April, 2018.
(Ananya Ray) Member
New Delhi, 07th February, 2018
‘A’
FPA-FE-71/MUM/1998
Page 1 of 1
Shri Ashik Shah
The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement
Ananya Ray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
