The Appellate Tribunal permitted the appellant additional time to file a stay application, conditioned upon filing it in accordance with the law, due to objections raised by the respondent regarding the pre-deposit of penalty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-FE-67/CHD/2014
Shri Ajit Singh Sandhu & Ors. … Appellants Versus The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellants : Shri Shiv Sekhri, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Prashant Pandey, Legal Consultant CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SMT. ANANYA RAY : MEMBER ORDER 06.04.2018
FPA-FE-67/CHD/2014
The learned counsel for the appellant seeks time to file the stay application in view of the objection raised by the learned counsel for the respondent, with regard to the pre-deposit of penalty amount. Let the same be filed in accordance with law.
Re-notify on 27th July, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Ananya Ray) Member
New Delhi, 06th April, 2018 ‘A’
FPA-FE-67/CHD/2014 Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant requires additional time to file the stay application due to objections regarding pre-deposit of penalty.
Shri Ajit Singh Sandhu & Ors.
The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh
Manmohan Singh
Ananya Ray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
