The tribunal noted an adjournment sought by appellant counsel due to personal difficulty, which was not opposed, and listed the appeals for future consideration.
The Appellate Tribunal recorded an application for adjournment by appellant counsel citing personal difficulties. The respondent counsel did not oppose. No substantive hearing or decision is recorded in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-FE-64/CHD/2014 Shri Basant Singh … Appellant FPA-FE-65/CHD/2014 Sh. Jagdeep Singh @ Giani … Appellant FPA-FE-66/CHD/2014 Sh. Sukhwinder Singh … Appellant Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Gaurav Mittal, Advocate For the respondent : Ms. Aagam Kaur, Legal Consultant CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SMT. ANANYA RAY : MEMBER
ORDER 09.03.2018
FPA-FE-64-66/CHD/2014
An adjournment is sought on behalf of the appellant’s counsel as he is in personal difficulty. The same is not opposed by the counsel for the respondent.
List on 20th July, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Ananya Ray) Member
New Delhi, 9th March, 2018. ‘K’
FPA-FE-64-66/CHD/2014
Page 1 of 1
Shri Basant Singh
Sh. Jagdeep Singh @ Giani
Sh. Sukhwinder Singh
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh
Manmohan Singh
Ananya Ray
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
