Two appeals pending since 2014 were dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange in default due to the non-appearance of the appellants despite service of notices.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-FE-63/CHN/2014 Dr. Joseph Xavies IIibus Inbakumar … Appellant FPA-FE-68/CHN/2014 Smt. Marina Rajapaksa … Appellant
Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : None For the Respondent 2 & 3 : Mr. Prashant Pandey, Legal Consultants.
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 04.04.2018
FPA-FE-63 & 68/CHN/2014
The above mentioned appeals are pending since 2014. No one appears on behalf of the appellant even on the last date. Notice was duly served to the counsel for the appellant. There is no representation on behalf of the appellant. The appeal is dismissed in default.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 4th April, 2018
‘K’
FPA-FE-63 & 68/CHN/2014
Page 1 of 1
Dr. Joseph Xavies IIibus Inbakumar
Smt. Marina Rajapaksa
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Manmohan Singh
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
