List order in enforcement proceedings regarding extension of interim orders; no substantive disposal or legal principle established.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-FE-58/HYD/2014
M/s. Promark Infotech Pvt. Ltd.
… Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Ms. Jyoti Rajput, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Prashant Pandey, Legal Consultant
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 02.05.2018
FPA-FE-58/HYD/2014
The learned counsel for the appellant has produced the photocopy of the order passed by the High Court of Judicature of Hyderabad wherein the interim order passed on 28th September, 2015 which indicates that the interim order granted on 27th September, 2014 is extended. The learned counsel for the appellant states that the said order is extended time to time. The learned counsel for the respondent seeks time to verify the position. The appellant is to produce copies of all orders on the next date.
List on 3rd October, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member New Delhi, 2nd May, 2018
‘d’
FPA-FE-58/HYD/2014
Page 1 of 1
M/s. Promark Infotech Pvt. Ltd.
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
MANMOHAN SINGH
G.C. MISHRA
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
