Order recalling an adjournment in foreign exchange appeals due to non-appearance of appellants' counsel. No substantive disposal.
Appeals against enforcement proceedings adjourned because appellants' counsel failed to appear for multiple hearings. Admonition issued; date fixed for future appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT
AT NEW DELHI
FPA-FE-552/MUM/2004 M/s. Pallavi Commercial (P) Ltd. … Appellant FPA-FE-553/MUM/2004 Pawan Bartya … Appellant FPA-FE-554/MUM/2004 M/s Sagar Exports … Appellant Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : None For the respondent : Shri Prashant Pandey & Ms. Aagam Kaur, Legal Consultant
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 17.04.2018
FPA-FE-552-554/MUM/2004
The counsel for the appellant is not appearing for the last many dates. In the interest of justice, order has not been passed. In case, no one appears on behalf of the appellant an appropriate order would be passed.
Copy of the order be sent to the appellant as well as his counsel.
List on 28th May, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore)
Member
New Delhi, 17th April, 2018. ‘K’ FPA-FE-552-554/MUM/2004
Page 1 of 1
M/s. Pallavi Commercial (P) Ltd.
Pawan Bartya
M/s Sagar Exports
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
