Matters stayed on stay applications for dispensation of pre-deposit amount under the PMLA/NDPS/SE ZONA framework. Appellants directed to file written synopses within one week.
Stay application reserved; written synopsis ordered within one week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| (1) FPA-FE-40/MUM/2014 Shri B.K. Goenka |
… | Appellant |
|---|---|---|
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata |
… | Respondent |
| (2) FPA-FE-41/MUM/2014 | ||
| M/s. Welspun Corp. Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata |
… | Respondent |
| (3) FPA-FE-42/MUM/2014 | ||
| M/s. Krishiraj Trading Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata |
… | Respondent |
| (4) FPA-FE-43/MUM/2014 | ||
| M/s. Welspun Wintex Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata |
… | Respondent |
| (5) FPA-FE-44/MUM/2014 | ||
| Shri Balkrishna Goenka | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata |
… | Respondent |
| FPA-FE-40-53/MUM/2014 | Page 1 of 4 |
| (6) FPA-FE-45/MUM/2014 Shri Rajesh Mandawela |
… | Appellant |
|---|---|---|
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata |
… | Respondent |
| (7) FPA-FE-46/MUM/2014 | ||
| Shri Lal T. Hotwani | … Appellant |
|
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata |
… | Respondent |
| (8) FPA-FE-47/MUM/2014 | ||
| Shri Murarilal Mittal | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata |
… | Respondent |
| (9) FPA-FE-48/MUM/2014 | ||
| Shri B.K. Misra | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata |
… | Respondent |
| (10) FPA-FE-49/MUM/2014 | ||
| Shri K.H. Vishwanathan | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata |
… | Respondent |
| (11) FPA-FE-50/MUM/2014 | ||
| Shri Rajkumar Jain | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director | ||
| FPA-FE-40-53/MUM/2014 Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata |
… | Page 2 of 4 Respondent |
| (12) FPA-FE-51/MUM/2014 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Shri Nirmal Gangwal | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata |
… | Respondent |
| (13) FPA-FE-52/MUM/2014 | ||
| Shri Asim Chakraborty | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata |
… | Respondent |
| (14) FPA-FE-53/MUM/2014 | ||
| Shri Ashok Jain | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata | … | Respondent |
| Advocates/Authorized Represe | ntatives who appeared |
|---|---|
| For the appellant | : Shri Mukul Rohtagi, Sr. Advocate Shri Vikram S. Nankani, Sr. Advocate Shri Nikhil Rohtagi, Advocate Shri Abhishek Anand, Advocate Shri Udit Jain, Advocate Ms. Ashwini Chandrasekran, Advocate |
| For the respondent | : Ms. Aagam Kaur, Legal Consultant Shri Prashant Pandey, Legal Consultant |
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH |
: CHAIRMAN |
[ FPA-FE-40-53/MUM/2014 Page 3 of 4
ORDER 13.09.2018
FPA-FE-40-53/MUM/2014
All the parties made their submissions in the stay application for dispensation of pre-deposit amount. The learned counsel for the appellant to file the written synopsis within one week time. Order reserved.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 13th September, 2018
‘D’
FPA-FE-40-53/MUM/2014
Page 4 of 4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether pre-deposit amount should be dispensed with as sought in the stay application.
Shri B.K. Goenka
The Special Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
