FPA-FE-22/MUM/2013 of Sh. Tushar P. Sanghvi v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai

ATFP1 Feb 2018FPA-FE-22/MUM/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Tribunal granted one final four-week opportunity to the appellants to comply with a High Court order (dated 21.11.2016) regarding deposit of funds. Failure to comply would result in dismissal of appeals FPA-FE-20/21/22/2013. The matter was adjourned.

What did the court decide?

grant of four weeks to comply with High Court order; failure results in dismissal of appeals

FPA-FE-22/MUM/2013 of Sh. Tushar P. Sanghvi v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai — ATFP (2018) — LawSathi Research

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

FPA-FE-20/MUM/2013
M/s Meridian Export & Industries	…	Appellant/Applicant
FPA-FE-21/MUM/2013
Sh. Harish Sanghvi	…	Appellant/Applicant
FPA-FE-22/MUM/2013
Sh. Tushar P. Sanghvi	…	Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai	…	Respondent

¶3

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶4

For the appellant	: Ms. Anannya Ghosh, Advocate
For the respondent	: Mr. Prashant Panday, L.C.
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH	: CHAIRMAN
SHRI G.C. MISHRA	: MEMBER

¶5

ORDER

¶6

01.02.2018

¶7

FPA-FE-20/MUM/2013

¶8

The appellant has not complied with the order dt. 21^st November, 2016 passed by Hon’ble High Court. Eight weeks time was granted to deposit the amount which has not been deposited. One final opportunity is granted to the appellant to comply the same within four weeks otherwise the appeal is likely to be dismissed.

¶9

FPA-FE-20, 21 & 22/MUM/2013

¶10

Page 1 of 2

¶11

Counsel for the appellant at this stage submits that the appellant has moved the application before the Hon’ble High court for modification of the order unless same direction are complied by the next date of hearing. We clear that in case the order dt. 21^st November, 2016 is not complied the appeal shall be treated as dismissed.

¶12

List on 21^st March, 2018.

¶13

Order be given dasti to both the parties.

¶14

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶15

(G.C. Mishra) Member

¶16

New Delhi,

¶17

1^st February, 2018.

¶18

‘s’

¶19

FPA-FE-20, 21 & 22/MUM/2013

¶20

Page 2 of 2

FPA-FE-22/MUM/2013 of Sh. Tushar P. Sanghvi v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-FE-22/MUM/2013 of Sh. Tushar P. Sanghvi v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases