FPA-FE-200/MUM/2010 of Shri Prakash K. Mehta v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Case brief
What is this about?
Shri Prakash K. Mehta V/s The Joint Director…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT
AT NEW DELHI
| (1) FPA-FE-52/MUM/2011 | ||
|---|---|---|
| M/s Splendour Gems Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai | … | Respondent |
| (2) FPA-FE-53/MUM/2011 | ||
| Shri Kishore K. Mehta | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| (3) FPA-FE-54/MUM/2011 | ||
| Shri Govindbhai J. Patel | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai | … | Respondent |
| (4) FPA-FE-95/MUM/2010 | ||
| M/s. Beautiful Diamonds | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| (5) FPA-FE-96/MUM/2010 | ||
| Shri Kishore Mehta | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai | … | Respondent |
| (6) FPA-FE-97/MUM/2010 | ||
| Shri Rajesh Kishore Mehta | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai | … | Respondent |
FPA-FE-52--54/MUM/2011 FPA-FE-95-98/MUM/2010, FPA-FE-199-202/MUM/2010 FPA-FE-153-155/MUM/2010, FPA-FE-215-218/MUM/2010 FPA-FE-148-152/MUM/2010, FPA-FE-156, 158-165/MUM/2010 FPA-FE-180-184/MUM/2010, FPA-FE-191, 192 & 195/MUM/2010
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s Splendour Gems Ltd.
- appellant
Shri Kishore K. Mehta
- appellant
Shri Govindbhai J. Patel
- appellant
M/s Beautiful Diamonds
- respondent
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court