FPA-FE-16/MUM/2016 of Union of India v/s Mr. Aropert Lawrence
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellate tribunal adjourned six forfeiture proceedings because the respondent's authorized representatives were not fit to appear.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| (1) FPA-FE-44/KOL/2017 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Shri Awtar Singh | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata |
… | Respondent |
| (2) FPA-FE-203/MUM/2010 | ||
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| Shri Shaikh Mohd. & Shri Abbas Mohd. | … | Respondent |
| (3) FPA-FE-27/MUM/2016 | ||
| Union of India | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| Mrs. Gillian Elizabeth | … | Respondent |
| (4) FPA-FE-14/MUM/2016 | ||
| Union of India | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| Mr. Lan George Hutton | … | Respondent |
| (5) FPA-FE-15/MUM/2016 | ||
| Union of India | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| Ms. Susan Joyce Cotton | … | Respondent |
| (6) FPA-FE-16/MUM/2016 | ||
| Union of India | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| Mr. Aropert Lawrence | … | Respondent |
FPA-FE-44/KOL/2017, FPA-FE-203/MUM/2010, FPA-FE-27/MUM/2016, FPA-FE-14-15-16 & 11/MUM/2016
Page 1 of 2
(7) FPA-FE-11/MUM/2016 Union of India … Appellant Versus Ms. Sylvia U. Martin & Ors. … Respondents
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Shri Awtar Singh
- respondent
The Joint Director
- appellant
The Joint Director
- respondent
Shri Shaikh Mohd. & Shri Abbas Mohd.
- appellant
Union of India
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · December
- Case no.
- FPA-FE-16/MUM/2016
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court