Dismissed

FPA-FE-13/CHN/2017 of M/s. Garg Iron & Energy (P) Ltd. v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai

ATFP20 Mar 2018FPA-FE-13/CHN/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The appellant, M/s. Garg Iron & Energy (P) Ltd., did not appear in person or by counsel. Under Acts 13 FEM R Off and Appr, the appeal was dismissed in default of appearance while the appeal was against an order dated 29 December 2016.

What did the court decide?

The appeal was dismissed in default due to non-appearance.

What the court decided

FPA-FE-13/CHN/2017 of M/s. Garg Iron & Energy (P) Ltd. v/s… — Company and Corporate | ATFP (2018)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

FPA-FE-13/CHN/2017

¶3

M/s. Garg Iron & Energy (P) Ltd. … Appellant

¶4

Versus

¶5

The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent

¶6

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶7

For the Appellant	: None
For the Respondent	: Mrs. Prashant Pandey, Legal Consultant
	Ms. Aagam Kaur, Legal Consultant

¶8

CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN

¶9

ORDER 20.03.2018

¶10

FPA-FE-13/CHN/2017

¶11

The appeal has been filed against the order dated 29^th December,

¶12

2016 along with the prayer of dispensation of the penalty amount.

¶13

No one appears on behalf of the appellant even on the second call. The appeal is dismissed in default.

¶14

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶15

New Delhi,

¶16

20^th March, 2018

¶17

‘AS’

¶18

FPA-FE-13/CHN/2017

¶19

Page 1 of 1

FPA-FE-13/CHN/2017 of M/s. Garg Iron & Energy (P) Ltd. v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

FPA-FE-13/CHN/2017 of M/s. Garg Iron & Energy (P) Ltd. v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases